Google change affects external link count

Advertisement

Google has made yet another seemingly small tweak with potentially big impact on SEO. The site's latest changes affect how Google counts external links, which, as you know, is one important attribute to boost pagerank in searches.

According to a post Wednesday on Google's Webmaster blog, domains (www.example.com) and subdomains (pets.example.com) will now be treated the same. That means that linking from pets.example.com to example.com would be counted as an internal link ― not an external link. Google
 
Publishers looking in their Webmaster Tools at internal links vs. external links can expect to see their external link number go down, as some links previously classified as external links will now be internal. 
 
Google says the change was meant to present links “in a way that more closely aligns with your idea of which links are actually from your site vs. from other sites.” To be fair, some publishers might find it beneficial to receive a more accurate reading.
 
But this is bad news for publishers that were able to use the previous classification in order to cross-link across sites to help SEO. Some media companies use their subdomains to link to their main domain in order to boost external links and therefore Google search rank. For instance, networks like About.com use subdomains like retail.about.com. 
 
The latest change is one of many efforts Google is making this year to its search algorithm, and another sign that you can't rely on gaming Google as part of your SEO strategy. At any second, the search giant can change things up. 
 
Will Google's changes affect your site's SEO? Please let us know in the comments below. 

Sponsored Resources


Join the discussion

Anonymous on December 31, 1969
Thank you for posting this article! Our inbound links dropped from 20,000 down to 80 this week, which is scary. This explains a lot. I took a look at our internal links, and they jumped significantly. Luckily, our Google page ranking has stayed the same - so I wonder if those links weren't really counting in Google's algorithm anyway?
Anonymous on December 31, 1969
You are right Ellie to write that "this is bad news for publishers that were able to use the previous classification in order to cross-link across sites to help SEO" - but anyway it's good for the users of Google search. Cross-linking from sites owned by one publisher has never been a true qualitative link from a visitor perspective. - Thanks for your piece and for keeping your community of readers informed! Steffen Konrath Future of Journalism Blog: http://www.nextlevelofnews.com Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/stkonrath
Ellie Behling on December 31, 1969
Hi Steffen - Thanks for the thoughtful comment. You make a good point that what might be better for getting information to consumers is not necessarily beneficial to the bottom line of content organizations. But I also can't blame media companies for trying to get the most out of the Google system! The most important point I wanted to make is that media organizations can't let their SEO strategy revolve around Google's algorithm, which, as we can see, can be changed up at any time. -Ellie Behling
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Don't SPAM our Comments!

Any commercial link will be deleted and reported to Mollom as SPAM. As such, we highly recommend against including commercial links in comments. Even comments with a reasonable amount of relevancy to the subject will be deleted and reported as SPAM.